Kio Esan la Ideo de Internaxa Asista Lango ?
La mondo esan dislarjisanta. En pasinto fremda peplos esin milos ay tagos
fora. Sed nun per moderna komunikilo ,speciale per interneto, ciu en la terglobo
povan esi nur bi sekondos fora. Kiel civilizo, mu nidan iri trans
limos de reciproka ekskluda naxa langos.
Nun mu povan sendi signalos cie en mua globo, sed car egzisto de ekskluda
naxa langos, la ricevita signalos ne povan komprenebla.
Esan tempo por huma intelekto solvi efekte tiu problemo. Teka metodo
esan kum biga kosto, la tradica metodo esan kosta traduko ay interpreto.
If mu povan serci diskosta metodo, kiu ne havan teka disfacilo, do ji esan inda
por reserco per mua cerbos. Ji esan IAL(internaxa asista lango) hipoteso.
En la pasinto studento lernin un or mor fremda langos kiu esin signo kiel
tiketo por farisi konata de la mondo. Nun situo esan tute alia, kum naxa langos
mor ol mil. Por servi la mor nova peplos kiu iran en globa ekonomio ay kulturo de
indijena peplos, traduko ay traduka programos ne povan kontinui.
Lokala asista langos esan proponita por Asio, Europo, Afriko. Sed ji esan
nur parta solvo de problemos, sed ne globa solvo.
Selekto de la most fita lango , kiu esan edukata en ciu lerneyos kiel la biu
lango en la mondo teorie ne esan disfacila. Sed ji esan rezistita de psikologa
ay kultura kialos.
Antaw tri-kwaronos de yercento , Ligo de Naxos votin rezolvo pri Esperanto kiel IAL.
Sed la rezolvo esin perdita. Eble, esan tempo por provi ji de la
civilizo-bildoros denove, sed ci foye, ji nidan studi antaw decido.
Kiam un lango esan selektita kiel IAL, diseduka peplos povon akiri eduko
per nova medio, sed pensistos havon metodo por komuniki kum alia en la globo.
Cu mu esan preta por monda nova prospero?
附英语原文:
WHAT
IS THE IDEA OF AN INTERNATIONAL AUXILIARY, AND WHY?
The world is shrinking, and in a previous age foreigners were miles and days
away.
Now, with modern communications - especially the Internet - anyone on the globe
could be only two seconds away.
As a civilization we have outgrown the restrictions placed on us by the often
mutually exclusive national languages.
We now have the ability to send signal to anywhere on the planet; but, because
of the existence of non-compatible national languages, there is no guarantee
that the signal will be meaningful when received.
It is time for human ingenuity to come up with an effective solution to this
problem: the technological fix is being tried - at great expense; and the
traditional alternative is costly translation and interpretation.
If a low-cost solution, that has no technological overhead, can be found, then
it deserves to be researched by our best brains. This is the IAL hypothesis.
Formerly a school student learnt one, or more, foreign languages, and this, as
well as being a sign of his education, was his ticket to the known world.
Now, the situation is totally out of hand, with the number of national languages
in use over a thousand. To service the newer populations coming into the global
economy and culture, the emerging indigenous peoples, translation and
translating programs just cannot keep up.
Regional Auxiliary Languages have been proposed for Asia, Europe and Africa, but
these are only partial solutions to the total problem, and hardly Global
solutions.
The selection of the most suitable language to be taught in all schools - as the
Second Language for the world - is not a theoretical difficulty, but it is
opposed for psychological and cultural reasons.
Three quarters of a century ago the League of Nations voted on a resolution to
adopt Esperanto as the IAL: while the vote was lost then, perhaps it is time for
civilization builders to try again ... but with proper comparative research
prior to a decision, this time.
Once one language has been chosen to serve as the IAL, then the illiterate
masses can gain an education through the new medium; and, thinkers will have the
means of communing with other like minds anywhere on the planet. Are we ready
for World Renaissance?